1.
Q: WHAT IS THE LEGAL BASIS OF THE PROHIBITION ON THE “RETURN, NO
EXCHANGE” POLICY OF BUSINESS ESTABLISHMENTS?
A:
Pursuant to the implementing Rules and Regulations of R.A. 7394, or
the Consumer Act of the Philippines, specifically Title III, Chapter
I, Rules 2, Section 7 of department Administrative Order (DAO) No. 2,
series 1993, the words “No Return, No Exchange”, or words to such
effect shall not be written into the contract of sale, receipt or
sales transaction, in any document evidencing such sale or anywhere
in the store or business establishment.
2.
Q: WHAT IS THE RATIONALE FOR THIS PROVISION?
A:
The prohibition is aimed to correct the misconception of a lot of
consumers that they do not have the right to return shoddy or
defective goods or demand for remedies in case of defective or
imperfect service because of the “No Return, No Exchange” notice
in the receipts or anywhere in the business establishment.
3.
Q: WHY IS THE PRESENCE OF A “NO RETURN, NO EXCHANGE” NOTICE
CONSIDERED DECEPTIVE?
A:
Such statement is considered deceptive because consumers may return
or exchange the goods or avail other remedies in case of hidden
faults or defects, or any charge not known to the buyer. By provision
of law, sellers are obliged to honor their implied warranties and
grant corresponding remedies to consumers’
4.
Q: CAN BUSINESS ESTABLISHMENTS STILL ISSUE OFFICIAL RECEIPTS WITH
THE “NO RETURN, NO EXCHANGE”?
A:
Business establishments with unused Official Receipts should erase or
blot out the words “No Return, No Exchange” before issuing such
receipts and henceforth, such words should no longer be printed in
their receipts or anywhere in their business establishments.
5.
Q: IF AN ITEM BOUGHT FROM STORE Y TURNS OUT TO BE MORE EXPENSIVE
THAN A SIMILAR ITEM IN STORE X, CAN THE CUSTOMER RETURN THE ITEM AND
ASK FOR A REFUND?
A:
No, while consumers have the right to choose and make a canvass of
prices, once a sale is consummated and the product has no defect, one
cannot return the goods nor ask for a refund.
6.
Q: CAN A STORE EXERCISE ONLY A POLICY OF EXCHANGE BUT NOT REFUND?
A:
Consumers are entitled to either exchange or refund, as long as there
is a defect in the quality of goods or imperfection in the service.
7.
Q: IF THE DEFECT IS DUE TO MISHANDLING ON THE PART OF THE BUYER,
CAN HE STILL RETURN THE ITEM AND DEMAND AN EXCHANGE OR REFUND?
A:
No, prohibition covers only hidden defects, shoddy goods or imperfect
service.
8.
Q: IF AFTER BUYING A CERTAIN ITEM, A CUSTOMER CHANGES HIS MIND AND
WANTS TO RETURN SAID ITEM, CAN HE INVOKE THE PROHIBITION ON “NO
RETURN, NO EXCHANGE”?
A:
No, the prohibition is not an excuse for the consumers to return the
goods because of a change of mind.
9.
Q: IS THERE A TIME LIMIT WITHIN WHICH A BUYER MAY RETURN DEFECTIVE
PRODUCTS?
A:
There is no hard-and-fast rule on the period within which a customer
may return the products he purchsed. A rule of reason should,
however, be observed, taking into consideration the nature of the
item purchased and the express/ implied warranties mandated by law,
i.e. The Consumer Act and the New Civil Code of the Philippines.
10.
Q: CAN A BUYER RETURN DEFECTIVE GOODS WITHOUT THE OFFICIAL RECEIPT?
A:
The Official Receipt is the best proof of purchase.
However,
a buyer may still demand replacement or refund if he can prove that a
defective item was bought from a certain store.
11.
Q: CAN A STORE PRINT IN THEIR INVOICES THE STATEMENT “EXCHANGE OF
MERCHANDISE WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED WITHOUT A VALID RECEIPT OR OTHER
EVIDENCE OF PURCHASE”?
A:
No, because there may be goods exclusively manufactured or sold by a
company and there is no need to prove purchase of the item.
12.
Q: CAN A STORE IMPOSE THE CONDITION THAT MERCHANDISE CAN ONLY BE
EXCHANGED ONCE?
A:
No, because merchandise can be exchanged as many times as these are
defective as long as the consumer chooses the option of replacement.
13.
Q: WHAT SHOULD A CONSUMER DO IN CASE A STORE IS FOUND VIOLATING THE
PROHIBITION ON “NO RETURN, NO EXCHANGE” POLICY?
A.
He / She can file a complaint with the DTI, with the following
information:
I.
the names and addresses of the complainant and the firm / entity
being complained about;
II.
the acts or omissions constituting the offense including the
approximate date, place and time of its commission;
III.
the remedy he is seeking from the Department, other than damages;
IV.
Any other relevant information the consumer may have regarding the
matter.
14.
Q. WHERE SHOULD THE COMPLAINT BE FILED?
A.
All complaints should be addressed to the Provincial Office of the
Department of Trade and Industry. Evidence available to the
complainant such as the product bought, preferably unopened or
sealed; xeroxed copy of the receipt issued to him as evidence of the
sale; advertising materials or brochures advertising the product;
etc., should be brought by the complainant to the DTI Provincial
Office.
15.
Q. WHAT ARE THE REMEDIES AVAILABLE TO CONSUMERS UNDER THE RULES
MENTIONED ABOVE?
A:
a) For quality imperfection, the customers has the right to choose:
-
replacement of the product by another of the same kind in a perfect
state of use;
-
immediate reimbursement of the amount paid;
-
proportionate price reduction;
B)
For product quantity imperfection, the consumer may demand
alternatively at this option:
-
the proportionate prices;
-
the supplementing of weight or measure differential;
- the replacement of
the product by another of the same kind, mark or model, without said
imperfections;
-
immediate reimbursement of the amount paid, with monetary updating
without prejudice to losses and damages, if any.
16.
Q.: CAN THE STATEMENT “EXCHANGE WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED ON ITEM IN
ANY WAY USED, DAMAGED OR ALTERED” BE PRINTED ON INVOICES?
A.: No, because there may
be items which can be determined as defective only when used.
Moreover, the right to determine whether goods are damaged or altered
cannot be reserved exclusively for the company since this is a matter
between the customer and the company.
17.
Q.: IS THE CONDITION “SALE ITEMS ARE NON-REFUNDABLE” ALLOWED?
A.: This has the same
effect as the “No Return, No Exchange” provision. However in the
case of sales promotions like “water or fire-damaged sale”, the
statement may be allowed provided the defects are apparent and
visible to the consumer and that proper disclosure in the form of
tags or notices are made at the time of purchase.
Wow... Sound like nonsense and I don't even feel the security.
ReplyDelete